-- Advertisement --

General McChrystal Says Conditions in Afghanistan are Deteriorating

New military leader to call for shift in strategy
general mcchrystal

While President Obama is facing increasing skepticism at home over the war in Afghanistan, the top U.S. military leader there is preparing a sober evaluation for the president of the difficult mission ahead. Recently promoted to leadership of the U.S. military mission in Afghanistan, General McChrystal has condemned the terrible state of Afghan governance and suggested that the U.S. military will have to fight Afghan government corruption in order to improve prospects for achieving U.S. goals there.Relying on leaked details from unpublished material, the UK's Guardian reported that General Stanley McChrystal has likened "the US military to a bull charging at the matador-like Taliban and slightly weakened with each 'cut' it receives." The General's review "is also expected to confirm that protecting the Afghan people against the Taliban must be the top priority.

Prior U.S. military efforts have focused on hunting for Taliban and Al Queda militants. Problems with this strategy have been widely reported. The Taliban disappear into the local communities when U.S. forces get the upper hand in a fight. Then, when U.S. forces move on, the Taliban reappear and exact ruthless punishment on those Afghans who cooperated with American forces. Taliban executions have devastated local leadership and frightened villagers.

Another problem was that U.S. offensives often rely on remote technology such as remote controlled "drone" aircraft. Targeted bombings are often successful at killing Taliban, however, numerous civilians are caught in bombings, which are widely reported. Civilian deaths have angered Afghans and turned some away from the American effort.

McChrystal is reportedly to tell Obama plainly that the current strategy is "not working."

The war, which began as a response to 9/11 under President Bush, was never successful at establishing control in the countryside. The U.S. has dominated major urban areas and helped install national and local leadership, but much of the country remained in Taliban or Warlord control.

McChrystal was asked by President Obama for a new evaluation of the Afghan theater soon after he was promoted in June. The president also sent 20,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and it was widely believed that a “surge” as used Iraq was all that was needed to shore up the battle in Afghanistan, where the U.S. supported Karzai government has been in office for nearly seven years.

Comments by McChrystal and other Afghanistan experts suggest a more dire situation, and the recent assassination of the deputy head of Afghan Intelligence confirms deteriorating security conditions.

McChrystal testified recently that corruption of the Afghan government is so pervasive that it may turn the public towards the Taliban.

A shift away from hunting Taliban to protecting the local population has already begun. This strategy requires additional troops to secure large areas of the countryside. While the current report is not expected to request additional troops, such a request is expected.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (6) COMMENTS
LORETTA MCALEER
Sep. 03, 2009
10:00 AM EDT
What is it going to take in APHGANISTAN ? The Aphgan population does not support our military involvment . They are not sure if the TALIBAN is worse than than the goverment . We are supposibly there to liberate the Aphgan people , when we try to secure an area we have to go back and pay (cash money) to the people ,are we crazey? How can we ever liberate a country who is not sure of their own loyaltys .We do not have the resources or millitary forces to continue in this war.

Yaqoob
Sep. 03, 2009
01:45 PM EDT
Afghanistan is a huge mistake. American troops should please be sent home unless they are sacrificed for mass slaughter. When will American leaders ever learn that force of arms never present permanent solution? Or are Americans doomed to making the same mistakes always and forever? I doubt, but the American leadership does not only appear insensitive to the American sensibilities, it infact is!!! And the American public must learn to read the actions of their leaders even before the actions themselves take place and design all the necessary counter-measures to cushion the effect(s); Americans appear doomed by their absolute belief in their leaders majority of whom seem sadistic in their actions as well as inaction.

Thomas Walsh
Sep. 08, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
The short sightedness of the American people will never cease to amaze me. Let me spell it out clearly. IF we leave Afghanistan, this is what will happen. The Taliban will take back over. They will ingratiate themselves to a major power in the region (or near region---read Russia or North Korea). They will foment war between Pakistan and India on an even larger scale than they do now. They WILL get their hands on nuclear weapons, either from a new ally or by taking it from a war torn region. Game over. It's that simple. The fact that so many tree huggers don't get this is astounding. And please don't call Afghanistan this generations Vietnam. Many Americans travel in Vietnam today quite peacefully, even the north. If we leave Afghanistan, no American will ever be able to go back there. EVER. The ideology's are so different between both war's that I can't believe that some people don't follow this. The Taliban/Al Qaida want to KILL every westerner on the planet. Period. Come to terms with that. It's a FACT. Now figure out the best way for us to survive such a threat without having to look over our shoulders again. Please.

LORETTA MCALEER
Sep. 14, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
September 12,2009 , Thank You Carl Levin, ( Senate Panel Chairman) Democrat from Michigan .NOT MORE TROOPS , but training the Aphgans people to secure their own country ,the Taliban gained significant support since the Americans have left a larger footprint in the area. Additional American involment is not the answer. Senator Levin needs to hear from all concerned Americans that we support his course of action. WRITE TODAY ,GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS.

Michael
Sep. 15, 2009
06:00 PM EDT
I dont know if we should stay or not. Our last president made the mistake of diverting our military resourcesto fight Bushes personal war in Iraq which was highly mismanaged. Rediverting to Afghanistan is a good idea but it is such a complicated situation there. I agree with Thomas Walshes statement he is absolutly right. But the afghan government needs its corruption removed

Olga
Feb. 23, 2010
02:31 PM EST
What need to be done is a public relations war. People are won over by successful public relations appeals to their needs and they can be more educated about the type of choices they are and will be making.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues