-- Advertisement --

One Step Forward and Two Steps Back on Financial Regulation

Will the rhetoric of the G20 summit be followed by action?
G-20 summit

Financial regulation is crucial to repairing what has gone wrong in our economy. While the Obama administration has made some significant proposals for overseeing risk-taking and regulating more sectors of the financial marketplace, the Congressional battle has yet to begin.

The topic of financial regulation is again a news headline as the world leaders gathered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for the G20 summit. European leaders such as Germany’s Angela Merkel had high expectations on the issue: “Every financial market product, every institution, and every financial marketplace should be subject to regulation, and as a whole it must be a coherent move internationally.” As the Spring summit in London, in the midst of financial fright, nearly every leader spoke aggressively about such regulation with France’s Sarkozy hailing, "The time of banking secrecy is over." President Obama promised strong reform in the United States, saying "we agreed to increased transparency and capital protections for financial institutions. We're extending supervision to all systemically important institutions, markets and products, including hedge funds. We'll identify jurisdictions that fail to cooperate, including tax havens, and take action to defend our financial system.”

Six months later, in the United States at least, the path towards regulation is much less uncertain. The Treasury Department under the Direction of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has proposed greater focus on systemic risk and enlarging the scope of regulatory authority into previously unregulated marketplaces. However, some critics of the handling of the financial crisis believe government intervention such as saving Bear Sterns, the auto companies, A.I.G. and the banks, only encourages more risky behavior for entities that are too-big-to-fail. Moreover, Congress will be required to pass any new proposals into law, and financial industry interests are well-represented in Congress.

The U.S. system is currently so complicated, with so many different financial instruments and organizations involved, that nothing will occur quickly. President Obama and some in the U.S. government have criticized banks and sought to harness the public anger against bailouts and the financial institutions to support regulation, including restrictions on executive compensation. However, Secretary Geithner has reportedly stood against those efforts. Geithner believes that the financial industry is the backbone of the economic recovery and that attacks on financial opportunities for the industry could sabotage the still fragile recovery. In this view, a healthy and profitable banking system will be able to adjust to new regulations, where a weak system might not.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (5) COMMENTS
Faxon Green
Sep. 29, 2009
03:00 PM EDT
ALL TALK AND NO ACTION! What's new? We need one world government to get consensus and put some meat of the bones of policy making for the good of all humanity.

Robert Taylor
Sep. 29, 2009
03:00 PM EDT
Sir, get real. It was "financial regulation" that brought about this confusion to begin with going back to 1977. Requiring lenders and the secondary market (i.e. FNMA and FDMC) to make unwarranted, sub-par loans in order to garner votes from the ACORNs and their clienteles started the WHOLE process. Like an inverted pyramid resting on its apex, all the subsequent derivatives, credit swaps, underwritings, etc. rested on this false, government created miasma. It had no option but to collapse. Ironically, capitalism was blamed!! Government creates the mess (thanx to the likes of the Dodds and Franks and their ilk) and then blames something else. The media of course is too dumb and too controlled to expose this and connect the obvious dots. To regulate further is to follow in the steps of Hoover and F.D.R. and extend the crisis. The bailouts are nothing but pure theft of the taxpayers. These corporations that failed to properly analyze their asset/liability positions should have been allowed to file bankruptcy and work out their deficits. This process would have cleared the system...not prolonged this mess.

A Wake
Sep. 30, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
Thanks for telling it like it is Robert.

tony mizzer
Oct. 16, 2009
11:30 AM EDT
We have the best government money can buy!

Jim
Oct. 22, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
we should do the something we did under Hoover back in the 20's like Robert wants to do.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues