-- Advertisement --

Public Option in Health Care Reform In Danger

Is the Obama administration caving to Republican scare tactics?

A couple of high-profile appearances on the Sunday morning news circuit have stirred the pot in the debate regarding the current health care legislation. One of the biggest debates has been the public option that President Obama and many Democrats have been pushing for since the 2008 campaign trail. The public option would provide a government-run health insurance program that would compete against private insurance companies. This option would be to not only allow an affordable choice in health care for Americans, but it would also drive down the costs of insurance premiums and prescriptions in general. Republicans have fought the public option for fear of what a government-controlled health care system may do to the insurance industry.

Though the administration been in favor of the public option, they suddenly seem to be withdrawing their support. The continued public outrage by Republicans at town hall meetings, including threats of violence, have apparently caused the current administration to take a step back from public option and instead look towards compromising with Republicans by exploring nonprofit insurance cooperatives as an alternative.

The idea that the administration might be stepping away from its once firm public option plan came Sunday when the topic came up for both Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, while on CNN’s “State of the Union” and for Robert Gibbs, the president’s press secretary, while making an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“I think there will be a competitor to private insurers,” explained Sebellius on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “That’s really the essential part, is you don’t turn over the whole new marketplace to private insurance companies and trust them to do the right thing. We need some choices, we need some competition.”

While on CBS Gibbs echoed the sentiments. “What I am saying is the bottom line for this for the president is, what we have to have is choice and competition in the insurance market.”

Whether the President has enough votes to pass health care reform with the public option seems to be the million-dollar question. The portion of the bill that deals with the mistakenly referred to “death panels" has already been removed, in spite of highly Democratic support for the program which would have offered families end-of-life counseling.

Though compromise is the name of the game in politics, it is disconcerting to see the Democrats have to bend so much to appease the Republicans, especially considering a majority of their outrage is based on misconceptions and half-truths.

While the cries coming from town hall meetings across the country may be loud, they do not outnumber the majority of people of who, in 2008, voted in not just a Democratic president, but a Democratic majority in both houses.

When the voters elected the Democratic majority they were also voting in favor of health care reform that consisted of a public option. This is something that all Democratic leaders should consider between now and September when the bill officially goes up for a vote.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (37) COMMENTS
Joe
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
This whole health care debate has me in a tailspin. The radical left keeps fighting for government controlled health care. Why is a government plan the most important aspect of the health care plan so important to them? On the surface it may seem like everything will work as they say it will; however, what about the future. You know how Congress likes to change things. Will we be under the mercy of the radical left in the future as they try to change things for the benefit of the government? Will we see the government be the ultimate decider of life and death in the near future or will Nancy Pelosi use her political capital and influence over the House of Misrepresentatives to give our health care to illegal aliens? I just don't trust them especially since La Raza has already asked the administration to include all illegal aliens.

Dave
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
Are you kidding? "The majority"? And now when the truth about the then "slick" candidate Obama comes to light, 1) his approval numbers go in the tank, 2) people "the majority" do not want to have the government controlling their lives. Plain and simple truth is what they want. When the truth is brought to light, the American people will choose their own way. The way of America. Independence, a government that is not intrusive or all consuming, and the means by which they (the American people) can provide for the betterment of themselves and their families.

Larry Z
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
Ludicrous. Without a public option all else is worthless.The coop alternative is ridiculous. Will my doctor be in this coop. Will I be able to get a colonoscopy in this coop? I don't think so. What if I am out of town and need medical attention? If someone can give me the answer to the following questions I would appreciate it. It seems like I am trying to uncover top secret information. Many opponents to reform in the Senate and Congress say it is too expensive. How much do they pay for the health care of themselves and their family? How much do taxpayers pay for the health care of them and their families? How much do they pay for other people's health care? Why isn't this addressed? Are we not entitled to the same health care at the same cost of people who we pay?

Michael Gallagher
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
People voted for Barack Obama and against Bush's war. They did not vote for every plank in the Democratic platform. Opposition to the House health proposal is real.

Hubert McMinn
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
The artical in question appears to be slanted to the left and a finding that the right "Republicans" are wrong and eveil for the stand aganinst the Health Care Program of Mr. Obama. I disagree.Having Goverment in charge of anything is more expensive than private industry with many examples from Medicare to the National Budget. Both sides are to blame and it is hard to pick which is most to blame. The biggest problem with current health care is not what we have available but the American concept of getting it all for nothing and not being held responsible for their actions. Good effective health insurance is available at very much lower cost is avilable about 35%. Americans want things that look good but are not cost effective and they want a policy that gives them everything and cost them nothing. However, we do need a program for those that "really" can't afford it or that have become uninsurable.

John L
Aug. 18, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
The people deserve everything they are getting, they were warned about this guy, so "TOLD YOU SO" lets see if the American people get a clue and do the right thing and make this guy a 1 term President!

Dino
Aug. 18, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
He has been in office six months and the only thing he has done so far is put America deeper in dept! He needs to stop his massive spending spree and concentrate on fixing the economy and creating jobs instead of his trying to takeover of our health care. The people don't want Government controlling our health care!

LARRY
Aug. 18, 2009
01:00 PM EDT
WE DON'T NEED THE GOVERNMENT RUNNING HEALTH CARE .. IT IS AGAINST THE CONSTUITION .. THE GOVERNMENT HAS MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO DO .. SO STAY OUT OF HEALTH CARE ..

Richard cameron
Aug. 18, 2009
01:15 PM EDT
one again the fake news people, (they are in no way profesionals) have managed to lie to people, so as to stop meaningtful change. This crap has been going on since i was a teene, NOW is the time to put a stop to it, The Right wants war, we will give them war, at the ballot box. The Party of NO is dead for good this time, we voted in the Dems for a reason and we will vote out the GOPs for that very reason, and we will contribute to the GOP defeat. Backlash it is!!!!!

perry waddles
Aug. 18, 2009
01:15 PM EDT
grass roots got apresident and a majority democrates elected in nov.but the president and congress is acting as the repub licans won. that why the heath care bill is in trouble.if, the republicans, were in charge-they would use their numbers to get a bill and to hell with bi-partism . demorcrates should not pay any attention to those right wing nuts at town halls because those people donot vote democratic

Frenchie St.Laurent
Aug. 18, 2009
01:15 PM EDT
Obviously who ever wrote the above information hasn't read the health care plan

Wayne Drummond
Aug. 18, 2009
01:15 PM EDT
I don't know about you but I didn't vote for the "Health Care Reform" to be an automatic bill just to pass without reading it, understanding it or without this Countries Citizens Opinion or Vote on it, much less having the "administration" to not even read it, understand it or even listen to The American Votors on this rediculus bill.

Jack Russell
Aug. 18, 2009
01:15 PM EDT
What a liar Obama is every time he opens his mouth. He speaks in generalities, can't answer specific questions because he doesn't know the answers, his inexperience is showing, and he hasn't read the proposed health reform bill, and is class A idiot. Peoples eyes are now being opened.

Michael Sawyer
Aug. 18, 2009
02:15 PM EDT
I will reiterate what I stated before: 1. Identify the individuals that are disrupting town hall meetings, find out if any are being paid or transported if so; find out who's behind them then make sure that names of individuals and organizations get maximum publicity. 2. Publicly maximize the similarity to Nazi party tactics in the thirties. 3. Make it known that if health care reform fails the names of all who worked and voted against it will be made available to families and individuals where someone as suffered unnecessarily, or died because of their inability to afford timely medical treatment. In order to get this through we have to be tough and relentless, and once again if you can't run this campaign right my services are available. I should add at much less cost than the hapless and sorry individuals you have working on this presently. Regards Mike Sawyer

Deborah Marasco
Aug. 18, 2009
02:15 PM EDT
the Public Option is mandatory for people like myself that are unable to get health care because of pre-existing conditions, Polycystic Kidney Disease, even though I'm healthy now. This system forces me to live in pain and not treat conditions when i need to, which creates a sickness cycle because I can't do preventive care. I can't afford to go to the specialists I need to see because they turn me away, I can't pay upfront, so I don't get to go. This is the land of the free? I work full time, I'm a full time student, this isn't fair.

Edward Hosick III
Aug. 18, 2009
02:15 PM EDT
the president needs to get the mess picked up that the Bush people did , and get this economy back up every body keeps throwing money at the big buisness and they need to get rid of all of these stupid taxes like the right work tax , and tax on seeing a movie , a play , or seeing a band we like . Now we have to pay amusment tax plus they keep rising taxes we have no money to go out and buy a car or a house but yet they give all the breaks to buisness and the money, i am an accountant and it does not add up to me. these are people who have accountant taking care of their affairs but they are going to tellus whats good for us and they can't even take care of their own affairs they need to step back and take a second look at their selfves.

Michael Kolovos
Aug. 18, 2009
04:00 PM EDT
Public Option is a must. Without it the insurance companies will raise premiums to cover provisions such as termination of preexisting conditions, etc. I will not support reform without public option.

Michael Kolovos
Aug. 18, 2009
05:00 PM EDT
If a health care reform is passed without "Public Option" I will never vote Democrats again. Public Option is a MUST. Otherwise the insurance companies will raise premiums to cover preexisting conditions, etc. Non Profit co-ops will not be able to compete with Insurance companies.

Benny Black
Aug. 18, 2009
05:00 PM EDT
The Goverment needs to get out of the Health Care Business, or trying to be in the business. If we allow the public to seek out insurance companies across state lines and even international lines the competion will drive prices down and if we institute the proper rules regarding Malpractice Lawsuits against doctors and limit the amount a lawsuit of this nature can award the winner of the suit it will also deter the Ambulance Chaser from filing frivilous lawsuits against well meaning doctors. The next, and also very important, thing this will cause is the removal of the doctors need to order nonessential tests ordered just to cover their asses just in case. The bottom line, less tests ordered by doctors and the removal of the need of expensive doctors insurance to protect them from frivilous lawsuits,thereby lowerind doctor bills. The normal chain of events caused by competion between insurance providers for individuals seeking coverage will cause the price of individual insurance coversage to decrease in price. Lastly but not by any means the least, is the removal of any hands on policy of the government in the insurance business and remove the inevitable takeover of the insurance industry by the government. We must remove the threat of the government being in a position to takeover any aspect of the insurance industry. Every instance of the government taking over the running of any business eventually ends with that industry in bankruptcy. Congress and the Senate, get your hands off my healthcare. You have the reverse "Midas Touch"!!! Everything you touch turns to s--- !!! Leave it alone !!! Send the healthcare reform bill back to be rewritten and leave the government out of the healthcare industry. I will be the first to agree that it needs to be fixed but it does not need to be run by the government and destroyed. What we have now, even with it's shortcomings is much better than what you are proposing!!!!

thomas amick
Aug. 18, 2009
05:00 PM EDT
what is it that the liars in the whitehouse do not understand.this is not china or russia.the majority of the american people are sick and tired of these idiots obama;pelosi;franks;emanuel and the rest of these left wing radicals who think they can just take away our rights and use their radical thinking as they see fit.tell them all to go to hell

John Jay Humphrey
Aug. 18, 2009
05:30 PM EDT
I do not see how congress will pay for it. The Second Circuit has ruled that NY is sovereign and the federal government lacks the power to tax us.

art thurm
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
I'm trying to understand the adminstrations stand on the 'public' option plan. For private insurance to be competitive they claim a public option is necessary ? With over 1300 private insurers today in the industry , and public ( government ) run program will make it competitive ? As a businessman , to be competitive you have to cut costs. I can't compete with a ' competitor ' with a finance base of unlimited capital ( tax money ) . The tacit now from the adminstration is to attack the insurance industry as if then the insurers will have a change of heart as the HHS Secretary Sebelius quoted on Sunday, to induce private insurance companies to " do the right thing " . Well I got an old oil lamp in my garage if I take a rag a rub it maybe it will do the right thing . The Obama adminstration needs to take a business course like ' Business Management 101 ' .

JULIET
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
what is the diffrence between universal health care and health care reform? I voyed for OBAMA_ beacuse if the issues that concern 50+ yr.old people/ we are already in the hole aprox.$370+ trillion dollars in the hole thats coming from the tax payers I want to be enlightened and informed and I dont like the media- t5hey are a bunch of liers and thats where people are getting confused-one day its a positive subject next day its negative beacuse the people that can afford it are the people that dont care about the normal blue-collar workers-furthermore- where are all the alternative fuel, green jobs at! were starving here and all the jobs I am being offerde are in other states and I cant re-locate- I was a upper-middle class family -I lost my job and dont have the money to go to a 4 or 5 yr college/and I dont want ,the debt, when I graduate- If I was 25 yrs yrs, or so I would think about it, but I am 51 and I have pd my dues in life/ and I also have to care for a son who's schophrenic, and has to stay in a hospital, beacuse I cant afford to care for him,and he needs me and it hurts -I dont understand why we as the people /really have no choices -and its called survival- with all the bad news and my being sceptical- I voted for the best candidate for the job and - the mess with all the auto industries-people here in VA-- HAMPTON RDS-- I know that that some dealerships are turning around and re-selling the clunkers--Sooo I am highly upset that they are lieing and manipulating obama- and that is the way I am seeing these plans- I was a finance manager at a dealership and I wonder if the dealerships can be fined-I also know that change for the better is only going to work if people stop being crooked and tell us really---- WHATS GOING ON!!

observer
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
This bill requires effort by both houses because it is important for the american public. The scare tactics that are used by the republicians will hurt them eventually.Democrats need to reverse the play and show how this will help. Provide all with affordable insurance, not be denied insurance bevcause of pre existing conditions. Being able to keep your home because you have health insurance .More patients who will be going to the doctor for wellness visits because they can now afford it. Compassionate help at end of life . Knowing your rights .Small employers will have access to a helth program they can offer their employees. Keeping America healthy.

Chuck McQuade
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
"government run health insurance" does this mean the government collects a new tax from every one making a minimum amount of money, puts the money into a fund, hopefully building a surplus (the government requires this of private insurance companies) and then dispencing the money back to those that pay into it, as it is needed. Social Security was created with the same great intention. Unfortunately, the surplus (if one were to ever exist) gets spent on other things, more people collect than pay in and it the system eventually collapses . As far as " nonprofit insurance cooperatives", nonprofit organizations are supported by donations and volunteer work forces, with very few paid employees. I don't think the government version will operate like that. This is America, everything is done for a profit, politics included. Forcing doctors to accept less money, forcing insurance companies to pay a larger percent of patient costs, will only end up costing those of us who actually pay for our insurance, to pay much more. Eventually, the Americans that are going to be required to fund this "free medical for all, including illegal aliens" are going to join the ranks of those receiving everything for "free" and then even the politicians will be in the food lines, but there won't be any food left for any one. Change is needed, How about set limits for malpractice cases, no more law suits, no high lawyer fees, no court costs, no malpractice insurance. We just cut cost by billions of dollars per year. That money could then be used to cut costs to those that actually pay and provide coverage to some for free, but there has to be limits, minimum requirements of some sort, citizenship would be nice, inability not unwillingless to work and contribute. Perhaps the author and those in agreemnet with the author and all of the voters who voted for Obama, the Demcratic majority and health care reform should foot the bill for this great thing that you all want, as long as some one else pays for it..

Ronald Henson
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
Yes, I agree with the President about trying something. If we don't do something then we fail the future. People are not going to know until they try change and then they have to see something before they believe. And even if it fails. It was something. Don't let the wrong people tell you that nothing should be done.

Madeleine
Aug. 19, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
What Obama is doing is illegal and unconstutional, doesn't Congress or the Seante or the Supreme court know this? There is a law that prohibits Government from giving any kind of health care plans to anyone within the US let alone forcing it on us and giving it to illegal aliens. What is it abouit our constitution that means nothing to the Government anymore? They took an oath to uphold the constitution, they are breaking that law by forcing this health care plan on us, they broke th elaw when they got involved in the banking business and the auto business, any business, Obama crowed with pride that he made a profit on one of the bailouts, that is illegal, the Government is not to make a profit on any private business, its illegal. Are these people asleep or what? They should zall be impeached for not protecting us and our interests. If you want to bail someone out all you had to do was bail out medicaid for the poor and Social security gfotr the elderly and sick and medicare for retirees who hav epaid into it month after month. If you can give 8 billion dollars to acorn you could have given it to Medicare, same with the fed owned banks, any bank tha tbelongs to Rockefller is a fed bank and they know it, let them bail their own butts out, and the auto industry didn't need bailing out, you forced them into it and closed perfectly good franchises, you should all be impeached. read here how illegal what Obama is doing is.. http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd462.htm

Honorio Rivera
Aug. 19, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
A public option is necessary for the overhauling of the National Health Care Program for this country. The reason is obvious the poor people of America who cannot afford the borgeoning price of health care will be left in the wild. A working Health Care Program for all is a fundamental need for the nation's survival because wether we like it or not Americans have to defend for each and everyone inorder to pull this country out of mirage & enter into the new era of globalization. We need to secure everyone's health in order to remain competitive as a country. As an Industrialize (the U S) country we cannot deny the fact that economic dislocation of some workers are to be inevitable from time to time if not always. This is why the government health care option that serves as the safety net for individuals and family economically and socially. I would recommend a much simplified & much broader approach to this health care issue that we now face. To begin, let us start create government run hospitals, health and dental clinics run by government employed doctors, nurses and other health care workers. We cannot leave our the now health care system without other option. This is where the right to life, liberty and property rights are given much weight as defined by our constitution when both the private and public sectors work harmoniously and concertedly when one another in the free world.

Leslie R.
Aug. 19, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
It is not the Republicans who are blocking this legislation. It is public opinion and democrats who fear the continuation of their cushy job is in jeopardy. I do not care how much this bill is gutted by specific objections (death consulting, public option, etc.) This legislation needs to be killed in it's entirerty. Why? Because it meets not one goal of solving any issues regarding health costs( and in fact irreversibly worsens the issue) . The biggest piece of misinformation from those who support this is that they believe this means free health care. for all. This bill leaves the cost sharing per capita as a huge open field to gouge the American public as they run up the costs and ultimately delay or limit the services through typical government inefficiency. This is a Trojan Horse. In shell form this legislation transfers huge powers to the executive branch of government. Once this power is passed then everything the objectors do not like in THIS bill will appear by regulation and dictate over the course of the next 5 years without the visibility of legislative process. This is the incrementalism that Mr. Obama promises his far left cronies. Power has far more value then the logistics or details of this bill. It is the one thing they will fight to keep in the bill. I have yet to hear one pundit analyze the effects of this transfer of power, gutting our system of checks and balances and public visibility. There are few problems within our present day health care delivery system that cannot be solved or made better when the selfish political agendas and irresponsible behaviors of our elected are taken out of the equation.

Red
Aug. 19, 2009
04:30 PM EDT
There has been market competition among health insurers for decades. We can see the result; high costs and reduction in services. The health insurance industry needs REAL COMPETION. Nothing new about all the lies and misinformation from the RADICAL RIGHT. This is a direct result of ONE SIDED NEWS/ENTERTAINMENT SHOWS. It's sooo easy to convince people you are right when there is no one to argue with you face to face.

Madeleine
Aug. 19, 2009
05:15 PM EDT
Honorio Rivera, the idea of America is as little Government as possible, not more. The Medicaid system could have been bailed out instead of the auto industry. It is also Illegal, if you had read the link I put in my previous post you would see that. Everything Obama has done is illegal, the Government is not supposed to be in the health care business according to our constitution. I am sure you want this health care and Government run Doctors and dentists for a reason, do you think it is not up to you to pay for your own health care? why would you expect me to pay for you with my tax dollars? This is why the framers made this illegal, for that reason. The medicaid system has always taken care of the poor, including dental, but as they mispent our tax dollars they cut programs, this is why I said bail out medicaid instead of the auto Industry and you would have had a health care system for the poor. The illegals have used this system although they are not entitled to it, and it has run the system into the ground. We may be Globalized but we are not idiots. We see what the influx of immigrants, legal and illegal has done to California , it is broke, Hospitals and schools closed down, someone has to pay for all this, it doesn't sound like its going to be you. Most of us did not want Globalization because we are carrying the rest of the world, and they love it. Make the rich Americfans pay, well thats over , thanks to the Global giveaway program and marxists running it , we are now broke too. As the influx of immigrants come in the jobs are going out. the party is over , China is doing very well, why not go there and see what you will get for free, do you work Honorio? then you don't need free health care. if you don't work then apply for a medicaid card if there is anything left of it. People do not understand that these Government programs of which you speak are not paid for by the Government, we pay for it with our tax dollars, the Government has no money of its own, its our money they are lighting their cigars with. You sound like a socialist, we have had enough of socialism, Medicaid worked before and it can work again if we stop paying for people who are not entitled to it,as far a I know we still have borders, broken, but sill there. This is North America, not South America .Six months of socialism is killing us, stop picking over the bones. Honorio Rivera, read the link in my previous post, here it is: http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd462.htm What is it you don't understand about illegal health care programs?. I know you have no idea what our constitution says but its important to us, its all we

Ben Myers
Aug. 19, 2009
05:30 PM EDT
Birds of a feather flock together. Tou can tell the character of a person by the company they keep. This man (President) has been with buzzards all his life and it is revealed by the chickens he has surounded himself. Communist, tax evaders, ACORN, etc. All have one objective,"destroy this country".

Judy
Aug. 20, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
We have the best health care system in the world. Why would we want to jeoparadize this? A few simple changes could fix the problems our present health care system has. Open states' borders for purchasing health insurance. Let the capitalist system work. The public option is an attempt at a power grab by the democrats. Why do we want to ruin something that is best for the majority? Those without insurance already have safety nets so their needs can be met. Instead of bringing our health care system down to address the few, let's continue to make it better and better for all.

Madeleine
Aug. 20, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
No where in the constitution does it say we havea right to health care Honorio and its the right to life liberty and the persuit of happiness.. Property rights are slowly eroding with the new laws allowing your property to be taken to give to a walmart or if the Government needs it. It is unconstitutional for the government to get involved in health care or private business of any kind but now the Government is in partnership with private business, they call it the partnership with America. This is all against the Constitution but since we have no representation the Government does as it pleases. We had a good health care system, medicaid was wonderful if you had no money, we also had free clinics, I don't know if they are still out there though, medicaid gave dental and optical services along with hospitalization, what more could you want? The immigrants were coming in here from Russia and China and vietnam , Korea, and were all given a medicaid card, the Mexicans also, thats quite an overload, we keep bringing immigrants in as the jobs and the services go out the door, we can't take care of our selves let alone millions of immigrants. they have to come in the way they used to come in, a certain amount a year. Medficare was an automatic service given to people who reached 65 and no one asked for it, they just gave it to you and took the money out of your social security check, it isn't free but it is abused by hospitals and Doctors to offset the cost to them of treating medicaid and free patients, In England they employ 1 1/2 million people to work in their healthcare system of socialized medicine, it is a terrible system but it put a lot of people to work, there are more workers than Doctors, it does not work and people were coming here to get health care. I guess thiese are the jobs Obama is talking about, we pay for these people to go to work, this health care is not free, they want to put insurance companies out of business and have their own insurance, this is all totally illegal, Goivernment is not in the insurance business and it is not their place to create jobs. Why doesn't anyone know that. ? Better yet why doesn't anyone in Government do something about it. Yes we need a safety net for the poor and uninsured, but to expect us to pay for illegals and the poor of the whole country because Obama thinks we are unbalanced and have too mcuh, he said no country should be above another country, thats called communism. No one in this country is going to be railroaded into that . Communismim doesnt' wrok because the haves are going on fancy hyannis port vacations while the have nots are trying to find work and fight against this health care plan. When

Eric
Aug. 20, 2009
10:15 AM EDT
Apparently the Republican party is upset that the short list of unformed ideas and loose suggestions that they passed off as a health care plan was ignored.

R. L. Gilbert II
Aug. 21, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
You might be able to say that the way things have transipred, and have developed, are 'disheartening'; i believe this would be analogis to the bad taste left in ones mouth. Though I may understand the apprehension to state impressed or government induced/presented progressions, I believe that something correct is being presented. The haggle from the gaggle does nothing to or for the progression of the health care or any other system. We have to content with tired rhetoric, false accusations or 'misdirected accusations', to present the cordial term. The fact that there is so much inpressed of competition, nothing may ever get done besides the aforementioned 'tired rhetoric', though this cannot and should not be stated as the whole of the political realm. As vague as my post presents, or not, I think it holds the jist of the principles at hand.

Michael Scott White
Aug. 21, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
I absolutely agree that when the public voted the Democrats into the majoruty and elected Obama as the President, they were also voting for health care reform with a public option. The public has already been denied the possibility of an open and honest discussion of a single payer system by Congress from the beginning of this debate. If the public option is allowed to be compromised away, then what was election '08 about? If the majority of people will not be allowed to gain what they have voted for, what is next? Marching in the streets? Shutting down the struggling economy wioth work slow downs? Or maybe a true liberal party is what we really need to establish. All I see are Republicans and Repubicrats; the Democrat Party has lost its soul and despite election victory, just does not appear to be able or willing to work for the people. We have truly become an oligarchy of the corporate state.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues