-- Advertisement --

United States Reaching a Turning Point in Afghanistan

The coalition may have to step up or accept defeat
afghan war

The NATO effort to remake Afghanistan is floundering. In order to have a chance to succeed, American General Stanley McChrystal, President Obama’s man in charge of the Afghan war, says that more resources will be required. While a coalition of nations have joined the United States in the war in Afghanistan, the burden on the U.S. in going forward will be a heavy one.

The United States has already spent upwards of 200 billion dollars and lost 1,000 troops in the Afghan war. Coalition partners have also sustained losses as have Afghan forces, but the United States is by far the largest contributor.

The war has continued for eight years, although journalists who cover the war refer to different phases. The Taliban was successfully removed from official control of the government in 2001. The U.S. led coalition took control of major cities and the capital, Kabul, but has not achieved substantial control over the vast countryside.

It is generally recognized in the military that the war has been under-resourced, with not enough troops to maintain security in towns and villages throughout the country. In addition, the money that was put into infrastructure projects has not made much of a dent. Schools built have been destroyed. Villages which were won have since been lost.

While the surge in Iraq and shift in tactics which included paying Iraqi Sunnis to fight on our side, helped achieve a period of stability there, the rules are different in Afghanistan. Locals have not committed and Afghan forces have failed to show up in sufficient number to join the fight against insurgents. The Taliban is ruthless in exacting retribution on those who cooperate with the coalition forces and Afghans want to be on the winning side.

McChrystal has reportedly said that if the NATO coalition does not turn things around in the next 12 months, the Taliban will regain effective control. McChrystal’s evaluation of the Afghan government was no more promising. He blames the government’s rampant corruption for tuning off the Afghan populace.

U.S. officials are being briefed on the General’s recommendations, but the report has not been made public. It is believed that McChrystal will tell the President that between 10,000 and 45,000 more U.S. troops are required to continue operations in Afghanistan..

President Obama will have a difficult decision to make. He has stated that he believes that insurgent operations in Afghanistan threaten U.S. national security. Once he receives a complete reassessment from McChrystal on the military's plan to achieve U.S. goals in Afghanistan, the president will have to outline his vision to the American public, which is souring on the war effort. The costs are an increasing concern as the economy and deficits become top priorities. The president has the authority to continue even an unpopular war, but this could cost him support on his domestic agenda.

 
COMMENTS & DISCUSSION (8) COMMENTS
Tom Abner Sr.
Sep. 24, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
If the U.S. goes in and does not understand that countries history we are going down in defeat like everyone else.We Americans do not ever go in to win, it's always politic's and with Obama what do you think is going to happen,lost of life and money. What elese do we know.

James Pelletier
Sep. 24, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I Belive the answer l belive we can not win this war any more then we can change the people there who belive so strongly in there Religon witch having worked in those country's in there oil fields .I found there religen eas ther whole life . But we keep tring to change that.most of the problem"s arrive by us tinkering in there politce's

Robert Schledwitz
Sep. 24, 2009
10:45 AM EDT
I have met a number of returned veterans from the middle east recently. Their morale and sense of military accomplishment during tours of duty there are low. Many admitted they joined active service or state guard duty for financial reasons in these depressed economic times. Most are having serious readjustment problems socially and cannot find a full time job. I am shocked our leaders are still debating war strategy while the bullets are flying and young men dying. Take our soldiers out of harms way till there is a unified plan to defeat the enemy. Let the soldiers know what it is and put a time limit on accomplishing the mission. We have already been there twice as long as it took us to fight and win a two front global conflict in WWII! Have we not learned a single god damned thing from 13 years in Vietnam followed by the humiliating defeat there with over 50,000 troop deaths! President Obama's credibility as president is dependent on his immediate actions on this crisis. He had better act wisely.

Donald Bradshaw
Sep. 24, 2009
03:00 PM EDT
The United States and NATO forces should have never pre-emptively invaded either Iraq nor Afghanistan. The evidence is overwhelming that 9-11 was an "inside job" engineered and carried out by elements within the United States government (Bush administration, neoconservatives, PNAC, and the Israeli lobby) and Israel (elements within the Israeli government and Mossad). Many in this country and the rest of the world are aware of the truth and do not support America's imperial wars in the interest of global Zionism.

Michael A Demers
Sep. 24, 2009
03:15 PM EDT
It is time for the United States to stop being the policemen of the world. It is impossible to win a war when the people you are trying to help are not interested in helping themselves. This is a lesson we should have learned from Vietnam! It is time to get out of both conflicts and bring home our troops. Put all that money to use at home.

ray brown
Sep. 24, 2009
03:15 PM EDT
We cannot run away from our obligations to the afgani people as we have the Poles and Czhechs . Big O will try and the Dems want to but for our own good best we not.

Dominador G Robles
Sep. 28, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
The United States should reassess its present policy in Afghanistan. I am most concerned about our soldiers dying in the field and its millions of expenses. We have seen our failure in Iraq and we do not want to have the same failure in Afghanistan. I believe a more effective kind of solution will be done by utilizing diplomacy iin its highest forms. Meanwhile Aghanistan and all the countries around it should be responsible in eleminating terrorism in their own areas and surroundings. We can no longer afford to have our soldiers killed and expenses sp[ecially in this difficult times in our own land. In getting out of Aghanistan, we should confine our security in our own shores with a policy similar to the Monroe Doctrine warning any unfriendly countries of their actions. Our fathers and mothers can no longer afford to have their sons or daughters killed in any place in the world, much less spend money when our economy is hurting.

Judy
Sep. 28, 2009
10:30 AM EDT
Dr. Bill Wattenburg, radio talk show host on KGO radio in San Francisco, thinks this war needs to be fought differently, and he has common sense, realistic ideas on how to do this. Washington seems to be ignoring his ideas. He has also helped develop robots that would have a significant effect on saving the lives of our troops.

Share your thoughts on the story by adding your comments below. Comments containing profanity, derogatory language, or any form of advertisement will not be approved. Comments will be reviewed by the site's editorial team, so your post may not appear for up to 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

POST YOUR RESPONSE
 
 
Balance of Power

Track the United States government with updates on the three branches of government.

The Issues